William OXLEY

Bathurst Free Press and Mining Journal ( NSW )  Saturday 4 March 1854  page 3 of 6

WILFUL MURDER Maurice Dalton was indicted for the wilful murder of William Oxley on the 29th April last, at Mudgee. He pleaded not guilty and was   defended by Mr. Holroyd. Attorney — Mr.   Serjeant.

James Lucas Brandon deposed that about 1 o’clock of the morning of the 29th. April, he was proceeding homeward, playing a clarinet, when the prisoner walked up to him and after asking him what he wanted playing that b____y thing, knocked him down. He applied to constable Oxley for assistance who advised him to go home. He did so, and shortly afterwards stones were thrown at his door and upon the house. Again he went for Oxley for assistance who came out, and no sooner made his appearance than the prisoner accosted him in these words— “you’re   a B____y trap, I know you by your buckle.”   Upon proceeding to the spot he found deceased lying senseless and bleeding, the wound having been inflicted on the side of the head.  Cross-examined by Mr. Holroyd. He frequently saw the deceased upon duty afterwards in Mudgee— never saw him the worse for liquor, but recollected taking a glass with him on the Thursday before his death.

William Freeman saw the prisoner at Mr. Arthur Cox’s on the 29th April last, who was making a great noise. He ordered him away and was requested by him not to tear his shirt.   In a moment afterwards prisoner seized a big   bludgeon which he threw inside upon the bed in which his wife and children were sleeping. At this time the prisoner had a stone in his hand. He saw the deceased who was capable of walking unsupported.

Dr. Macdonald attended the deceased who had a wound upon the side of the head, which did not appear to he dangerous. Besides this he subsequently discovered, when holding a post mortem examination upon his body, another and more serious wound at the back part of the head, but from which no external injury appeared. He had no doubt but the blow’s accelerated, if they did not cause his death. There was a considerable effusion of blood upon the brain. Cross-examined by Mr. Holroyd : He did not know that the deceased drank, but he had the appearance of a free- liver. He saw deceased a few days before his death and heard of his falling over a scraper. From that period he had a succession of apoplectic fits which continued until death.

David Picton saw a man whom he did not know to be the prisoner near Brandon’s, at whose house he threw two stones. Shortly afterwards he saw Oxley leave his house and heard him speak to this man whom he named Dalton, and who in reply called him “b___y trap” ‘ A moment or two afterwards he saw Dalton strike deceased with a thick stick which felled him to the earth : blood flowed freely from the wound thus caused. He (witness) might be 20 yards from them at the time Brandon and he stood near each other.

Mr. F. Bailey proved that a charge for a violent assault was preferred against Dalton who was committed to take his trial at the Quarter Sessions on the 30th. January. Some time afterwards Oxley died and an inquiry was held upon his remains. The depositions were written by him as Clerk of the Court at Mudgee.

This evidence closed the case for the Crown. Mr. Holroyd addressed the jury in behalf of the prisoner. This case, he said, involved a charge of murder without malice, as from the evidence which had been given it was impossible to conceive that the prisoner could have been actuated by any such feeling. There was nothing before the jury to show that they were even acquainted, and from the nature of the wounds the blows must have been of a very trivial character. When the witness Freeman reached deceased he was standing upon his legs, and could not therefore have been very seriously wounded. There was moreover a discrepancy in the testimony of Picton and Brandon which showed plainly that both could not speak truth. The former estimated the distance at which they stood at the time the deceased fell at 100 yards, whilst the   latter fixed it at about 20. Clearly this was no case of murder, and he could not for one moment imagine how it was to be reduced even to manslaughter upon such trumpery evidence.  According to Dr. Macdonald’s testimony the   deceased had a predisposition towards apoplexy, and this predisposition was increased by ardent spirits of which it appeared probable he partook. It would also be fresh in the recollection of the jury that the deceased had fallen against a scraper a few days before his death, and had then most probably received the injury at the back of the head which caused apoplexy and hastened his   death. To his mind it appeared that an assault was the worst charge that could be fixed upon the prisoner.

He then called Constable Ashton of Mudgee who knew the deceased and remembered that on the 26th. February 1853 he had a fit about 7 miles from Mudgee, and was insensible for about three quarters of an hour, but had never seen him in one before nor since. Witness attributed his illness on that occasion to the fact that they had been travelling all day with a flock of sheep, and deceased had not broken his fast. About 16 days after the assault deceased was on duty and went with a letter for the coroner to Cloudy Bay, and did not return until the following day.

Mr. George Taylor, Innkeeper of Mudgee, remembered deceased’s going to Cloudy Bay in the early part of May in last year ; it was after the assault — had never seen him in a fit   until he returned from Cloudy Bay. On the morning after his return, heard some one screaming, and on going out saw deceased on the ground in a fit – knew that he had been on duty occasionally after the 29th. of April. Cross- examined, by the Attorney-General : The wound in the head was not quite healed at the time he went to Cloudy Bay and witness thought he was not able to do as much duty as before the assault. He did not appear to suffer from   any other cause than the wound in the head.

Mr. Alexander Watt was called to give the prisoner a character. He said he had known him for ten or twelve years, and on one occasion had employed him during the harvest — had also heard other persons speak of him, and   believed that when sober, he was quiet and well behaved, but when in liquor very violent. Beyond this he did not know very much about him.

The Attorney-General replied and made some stringent remarks about gentlemen appearing to give prisoners a good character of whom they know but little, the natural consequence of which was that the cases of those who really deserved a good character were materially injured. In reference to the case before the court he cited some cases to show that it was a matter of no importance whether the deceased was aged and infirm, or young and strong, but if his death was accelerated by the conduct of the prisoner the charge against him was sustained. He also directed the attention of the jury to the expression used by the prisoner at the time of the assault calling deceased a “B___y trap” &c.,   kicking him after he had knocked him down, and said if deceased had drunk too much or taken too much exercise after the assault it would not make an atom of difference ; for Dr. McDonald had declared that death had resulted from the effects of the blows upon the head.    His Honor, in summing up, laid before they jury very clearly and distinctly the difference between murder and manslaughter, and said that in cases of homicide the law presumed the existence of malice ; and it was for the defendant to show that he had just cause for his conduct in the affair. After reiterating the evidence he left the case in the hands of the jury. The jury found a verdict of manslaughter. Prisoner who was remanded for sentence.

The Sydney Morning Herald  Wednesday  8 March 1854  page 5 of 8

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND THE  MAGISTRACY.

(From Saturday’s Bathurst Free Press.)

In opening the case against Maurice Dalton, for the wilful murder of Constable Oxley, at Mudgee, the learned Attorney-General prefaced his review of its leading features by the following observations upon the general recklessness which prevails with regard to the issue of licences : –

This, he said, was one of the many instances which had recently come under his notice of individuals being intrusted with a publican’s license who were most palpably and flagrantly unfitted for such a position. Here was a man arraigned for the wilful murder of a fellow creature – a murder committed whilst in a state of maddening intoxication, who by some means or other had obtained a license as a publican. And how came this? Would it not be quite as safe, nay infinitely more so, to place deadly weapons in the hands of a maniac and turn him loose upon society, than to intrust a person of bad moral character, and a notorious drunkard to boot, with the power and   opportunity of inflicting such a vast amount of mischief upon the community. Only that very day it had transpired in evidence upon another case that the  prisoner had been a publican at Carcoar, and was known to the bench to be an habitual drunkard. Nay, one of the magistrates himself who appeared as a witness   had admitted that when he called to see him about the money which he was accused of stealing, he was so drunk as to be unable to speak sensibly and that he never saw him sober ; yet, notwithstanding these facts, known personally to himself, and occurring under the very nose of the Bench, his license was   subsequently renewed. What security, he would ask, could there be for the preservation of public order and against the commission of crime whilst magistrates thus culpably neglected their duty? One bad man invested with the privileges and opportunities of evil which appertained to such a calling, could accomplish a vast amount of mischief in promoting and fostering vice and crime, and in aiding in the demoralization of those by whom he was sure to be surrounded. It would be better to arm a madman with a firebrand and trust to consequences, than enable a person so devoid of character and principle to scatter about him the moral poison of his depraved nature. The frequency of late of such cases as those upon which he was now commenting impelled him thus publicly to call attention to the circumstance. And he must say if magistrates   tolerated such evils by neglect of duty, they were responsible for the consequences.

Such was the emphatic language employed by one of the highest legal authorities of the country under circumstances which demanded a strong expression of opinion ; and it is a fortunate thing for the colony that the position is filled by a gentleman who, regardless of personal considerations, has the moral courage to administer a castigation so well merited. We   agree with him, that to place such men as Henrys and Dalton in the situation of a licensed publican is to laugh at the law and treat public order and decency with contempt. A ruffian and debauchee are not to be placed in situations where duly imperatively   requires an unremitting self-control, and in which temptation is continually beckoning the most discreet from the path of rectitude with seductive arts and fascinating smiles. There is too little care taken in investigating   the characters of applicants for licenses, and   the consequence is witnessed in the fact that whilst the great majority of licensed publicans are men of good repute and undoubted integrity, many, very   many, have crept into the trade who would do little credit to any calling or position of life in which they might be found,

And herein principally lies the misfortune. Similarity of tastes and disposition surrounds such men   with the criminal and the vile. At such houses their depredations are planned, and there the wages of crime are dissipated. Money thus easily earned is recklessly squandered, and heedless of the source whence it has been procured, if not directly concerned in the plans of his rascally associates, the unprincipled tapster grows fat upon the spoils which have   been wrung from the honest and unwary. There sins and malpractices are, therefore, not only connived at, but encouraged. They form a perennial spring of profit whose amount is not to be despised. True to one instinct of our natures, where better sentiments are inoperative, he sells his grog, pockets their ill-earned cash, and ask no questions. To him the clever   and successful thief is worth infinitely more as a customer than twenty honest and reputable men, and hence such company is infinitely preferred. The wealth of a plundered community flows into his   pockets, and for this consideration he is ready to   administer in any shape to the base ( and brutal passions of his customers.

The above may be an extreme case, but there are many which differ only in degree. Men of loose or unfixed principles are not apt to be over-scrupulous where business is to be done. The tap runs freely whilst the cash is responsive, and under such circumstances little heed is taken of irregularities, improprieties, or the Licensed Victualler’s Act. The free   and easy style of such establishments suits the tastes of the reckless and the profligate ; and hence it ¡s that the respectable publican, whose regard for his own character and the reputation of his house will not permit any gross violation of law or decency, is most materially injured.

But we are very far from imagining that the rapid strides by which intemperance is stalking over the country are to be stayed by the most active magisterial superintendence. The root of the evil lies out   of the reach of all law – beyond the grasp of the most vigilant police. To read lectures to the magistracy will do little towards the correction of an evil which has eaten its way into the very vitals of our social system, and overshadows the land with gloom. All the powers of legislation and machinery of our courts of justice are unequal to the task of eradication. Society must expurgate itself, and it can only do so by the universal action of some powerful moral agency. No class is free from the taint of this cankering vice, and sermons upon temperance   delivered to the masses will be of little force or efficacy whilst the power of example is wanting in the ranks of those who claim the right to sermonize.

It is true that much crime and irregularity might be prevented by a stricter exercise of the discretionary power vested in the magistracy, but the public may fairly share the blame of recklessly licencing all applicants. No matter what the character, five respectable     householders will be found to parade their names in the way of recommendation, and it is notorious that   profit has often more to do than principle with the matter. In this manner men of indifferent or bad repute have passed through the magisterial ordeal into a   public-house, and have thus visited one of the sins of the community upon its own head. First – Mr. So and so, storekeeper, signs, because he is anxious to secure a customer, and uses his influence with a friend or two. Several good names being already attached, they   become a guarantee of the applicant’s eligibility for a license. Others are therefore easily obtained, and the bench by no means unwilling to forego the trouble of an inquiry which promises more kicks than half-pence, take it for granted that the applicant is what he is   represented to be. The learned Attorney-General could therefore have very well afforded to give his castigation a much wider amplitude.